FedWins™ is a patent-pending algorithmic model that helps federal contractors predict proposal success and make informed bid decisions. Developed by a former government senior procurement executive, the model leverages 30 years of federal contracting expertise in multi-billion dollar source selections combined with powerful AI technology to replicate how government evaluators actually think, debate, and decide.

Using strategic, diagnostic, and prediction modes, FedWins™ produces a powerful suite of data research products that provide a complete evaluator-authentic lens to visualize how bids will likely stack up and where to adjust as your color teams are going through the capture process.

Suited primarily for large pursuits, FedWins™ strives to offer a deeper level of objective insight from the evaluator’s perspective through what we call “purple hat” analysis, sitting between your blue and red teams and serving as a complement to black hat competitor reviews. The sequencing of a purple hat analysis is key because by the time the red team has kicked off it may be too late to course correct since the proposal is already in near-final status.

Designed specifically to assist federal market capture teams through realistic Capture Readiness Simulations, the model addresses a common problem set to include:

Making Evaluation Criteria Tangible

One of the biggest pain points for capture teams is decoding Section M factors and predicting how evaluators will apply them.

  • FedWins™ addresses this by translating criteria into mock consensus scoring sheets and a notional SSA tradeoff memo, so teams can “see” how their proposal will be judged before it’s submitted.

  • This reduces blind spots and helps align win themes directly with evaluation weighting.

Competitive Differentiation

Most capture teams struggle to clearly articulate why their solution is better than those of the competitors.

  • FedWins™ provides comparative win theme matrices for probable bidders and battle cards that highlight both strengths and potential vulnerabilities.

  • This allows teams to craft messaging that not only promotes strengths but also predicts competitor attacks.

Anticipating the Government’s Discussion

Evaluators in a Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) debate strengths, weaknesses, and discriminators. Contractors often fail to anticipate these debates.

  • FedWins™ simulates this via SSEB role plays, giving capture teams real insight into how evaluators might actually talk about their bid during consensus scoring.

  • This helps teams prepare for both written proposals and oral presentations with evaluator-focused narratives.

P-Win Modeling for Smarter Bid/No-Bid Decisions

Capture leaders may sometimes rely on incomplete data when deciding to pursue an opportunity.

  • FedWins™ includes a P-Win dashboard with sensitivity analysis showing how shifts in evaluation weighting (e.g., price emphasis vs. past performance) change the team’s competitiveness.

  • This provides executives with a data-informed view for bid/no-bid decisions.

FedWins™ is purpose-built to help capture teams move from guesswork to an evaluator-centric strategy, giving them a sharper competitive edge to maximize success.

FedWins™ aligns directly to some of the top challenges federal capture teams face to offer immediate value:

  • Challenge: Agencies increasingly lean toward Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) or price-weighted best-value tradeoffs. Capture teams often don’t know how much pricing risk to take.

    FedWins™ Solution:

    • P-Win Dashboard with Stress Tests shows how different price weightings impact competitiveness.

    • Teams can model outcomes under LPTA vs. Best-Value scenarios and adjust pricing strategy accordingly.

  • Challenge: Incumbent contractors usually have stronger past performance and institutional knowledge, creating barriers for challengers.

    FedWins™ Solution:

    • Mock Consensus Scoring Sheets highlight how incumbency shows up as a strength in evaluator discussions.

    • Battle Card Matrix equips challengers with counter-messaging to attack “incumbency complacency” while showing innovation or cost advantages.

  • Challenge: Large primes need to structure partnerships with small businesses strategically; small businesses need to prove they can handle scope.

    FedWins™ Solution:

    • Comparative Win Theme Matrices show how small and large bidders differentiate themselves.

    • Evaluator Roleplay Simulations reveal how agencies might debate small-business risk vs. innovation benefits, helping teams craft tailored narratives.

  • Challenge: Agencies are experimenting with new evaluation models, which sometimes catch capture teams unprepared.

    FedWins™ Solution:

    • SSEB Evaluator Roleplay simulates how non-traditional scoring methods impact evaluations.

    • Notional SSA Tradeoff Memos anticipate final award rationales under these methods.

    • Orals Rehearsal Kits arm teams with verbal “soundbites” evaluators are likely to repeat.

  • Challenge: Every bidder claims to be “innovative” or “AI-enabled,” making it hard to stand out.

    FedWins™ Solution:

    • Win Theme Blueprints refine innovation claims into evaluator-centric discriminators.

    • Comparative Theme Matrix highlights proof points that evaluators may cite in consensus.

    • P-Win Sensitivity Models test how much “innovation weighting” moves the needle vs. price or past performance.